CONSULTATION MUST GIVE FORTH AND CLYDE A CHANCE
SNP MSPs Stuart McMillan (West of Scotland) and Rod Campbell (N E Fife) are calling for support for the Coastguard bases at Clyde and Fife Ness after the UK Government confirmed it intends to close both bases.
Both MSPs have lodged parliamentary motions and are jointly writing to the UK Government for assurances that the final decisions have not already been made.
The SNP has argued that the UK Government’s failure to understand Scottish coastguard services and to respond to local needs should see the service devolved.
West of Scotland MSP Stuart McMillan who has supported Clyde Coastguard said:
"This proposal simply makes no sense and it is unclear who is to lead on services for the Clyde. Is it Stornoway – the nearest station in Scotland - or is it Belfast which has apparently been saved because it has "local knowledge" of the Clyde.
"The best local knowledge of Clyde is surely within the Clyde base.
"The Navy buildings where Clyde is based have been run down for years and this decision is more about avoiding the costs of upgrading an essential service than it is about safety.
"I will be writing to the UK Government seeking guarantees that this consultation is real, that they are open to preserving Clyde and that the decisions have not already been made."
SNP MSP for North East Fife, where the Fife Ness station is located, Rod Campbell said:
"The Forth, like the Clyde, is part of a growing coastal and offshore industry with new developments, offshore renewables, cruises, increasing leisure traffic and of course significant shipping.
"Despite the UK calling this a consultation it appears to be a fait accompli. North East Fife is once again faced with having to battle the UK Government over cuts and services that have a significant effect on the area’s economy and its future.
"I will be working with politicians not just from Fife but across the coastal areas covered by Fife Ness and call on them to support Fife Ness as a working coastguard station keeping those who work in, rely on and enjoy our seas safe.
"The UK Government’s decision makes it clearer than ever that Scotland’s seas and the coastguard service that covers them should be managed from Scotland and that instead of allowing the UK Government to shut our coastguard services and risk exposing the safety of our seas we should continue to argue for devolution of coastguard services so their future is determined by those who understand both the requirements and the potential of Scotland’s waters."
The following motions have been lodged at the Scottish Parliament
Stuart McMillan: Clyde Coastguard Closure
That the Parliament notes with concern the recent decision taken by the UK Government to close the Clyde coastguard facility in Greenock, Inverclyde; notes the Tall Ships event highlighted how much potential there is in the Clyde and the decision to close the coastguard risks the safety of those waters; further notes the Clyde is an increasingly busy waterway with ferries, shipping, naval waterways, nuclear submarines, industry and tourist boats all using the waters; believes closing Clyde is reckless and misguided and shows the UK Government continues to miss the point of local coastguard services.
Roderick Campbell : Forth Coastguard Closure
That the Parliament notes with concern the recent decision taken by the UK Government to close HM coastguard facility at Fife Ness, Crail; further notes that Fife Ness Coastguard station currently covers some 300 miles of coastline, having responded to over 1,400 incidents in the past three years; believes that Fife is a county with a strong and continuing maritime tradition which requires a locally-based coastguard presence for the purposes of public safety on her coast and at sea.